Reality Hits A German Refugee Worker

This is the reality of the Muslim invasion. Liberals in Germany are having their eyes opened. Will it take the same for Liberals here? I pray to God no, and hope we nip this in the bud before it gets out of control.

Referenced from Pamela Geller, story from Die Welt:

“‘I can’t take it anymore’ – Hamburger Asylum Worker,” Die Welt, January 17, 2016:

“Since autumn of 2015 I have been working as a full-time and permanent employee in a Hamburger initial reception center for refugees. I had applied explicitly for this job, that was exactly what I wanted to do. When I finally had the commitment it in my mailbox, I Was madly happy about it. Finally I was able to not only help in theory, but to really do something for the refugees. 

Accordingly, I went in high spirits my first day to the initial reception; I was naturally excited, clear, one is always on the first working day of a the new job, but otherwise I was happy to be there. The colleagues were committed and very nice, but with the refugees I had still no direct contact. I greeted the area enthusiastically and found all was great. 

“It is certainly super here”, I thought to myself. In the next few days, I then threw myself totally motivated into my work with up to 1,500 refugees who were housed there. I was responsible for their counseling services as the contact for all social problems of refugees, supporting them in their asylum procedure or securing medical appointments when they needed that. 

Then the first refugees came to my office, where I wanted to stop the counseling services – After the first few visits I noted that my very positive and idealistic notion of them and their behavior was clearly different from reality. Of course you should not make generalizations about all refugees under any circumstances, there are many of them who are very friendly, grateful, very willingly integrated, very happy here. But if I’m honest, then the collaboration with 90 percent of those whom I meet is rather unpleasant and unfortunately not as I had thought before. 

First, many of them are extremely demanding. They come to me and demand that I immediately give them an apartment and a fancy car and most also want me to procure them a really good job, and I am supposed to say yes. I’m sitting there and they are indeed in immediate need. And, if I reject them and instead try to explain to them that these demands are not immediately possible to fulfill,  then they are often noisy and sometimes very aggressive. An Afghan has only recently threatened that he would kill himself. And a few Syrians and a group of Afghans have declared that they will go on hunger strike until I help them to move to another place.

Read the rest here.

Media Concerning Islam #4 - The Truth About Islam by Paul Joseph Watson

The problem isn't radical Islam. The problem is Islam.

The Republican Establishment Eviscerates its Own Base

Rick Wilson, a ranking member of the Republican establishment, has come out with guns drawn against Trump supporters. In addition to calling them “the screamers and crazy people” on the Right, he also said that there are lots who have

Hitler iconography in their Twitter icons, but the fact of the matter is most of them are childless single men who masturbate to anime. 

This is the short and sweet of how the GOP view their own members who support Trump. It isn't anything thing new. Yet Rick is correct in one part, they are most certainly “screamers,” Indeed, I'd say that most Conservatives, Republicans or not, are screamers. In fact, we are angry. We are seeing red.

Over and over again the Republican establishment has lied to its base. In 2014, they promised to fight Obama, repeal Obamacare, halt his outrageous spending, and bring the Republic back under control. The truth of the matter is that as soon as they were reelected, they went back to business as usual. As a result, a grass roots movement fueled by outrage rose up and Boehner was ousted from the House. What happened? Paul Ryan (R-WI) was elected to the now vacant position of Speaker of the House, promising everything Republicans promised before, only this time, he said he would only take the chair if he was not opposed. His first action was to pass a huge omnibus bill which continues to fund such things as Planned Parenthood, Obamacare, and the support of illegal immigrants. In fact, the bill was passed so fast that no one had time to read it in full before the scheduled vote. There are still things in that bill that we are discovering. In addition, Congress has allowed Obama to give billions to Iran instead of doing their duty by controlling the purse strings.

Ryan was a Tea Party favorite. In fact, he would not have been elected without their support. Yet once again, the GOP base has been shown that they were duped all along.

Yes, we Conservatives are mad. Raving mad.

So what does the GOP do? Attack its own base. Ever since I was able to vote, I voted Republican. I even went to the polls to vote for the RINO Romney. I held my nose as I did it, but I'd rather have him in office over another four years of Obama. Understandably though, many of the Republican base did not show up to vote, as they were sick and tired of the GOP placing skunks up for election. I don't blame them.

I stand with my fellow Conservatives by saying I've had enough. I'll never vote for an establishment politician again. In addition, I will no longer consider myself a Republican until some major house cleaning is done. For the truth of the matter is, there is no difference between Democrat and Republican “elites.”

As for the Hitler remark, I can only conclude that it is in reference to Trump and his supporters' opposition to Muslim and illegals immigrants. Apparently, the GOP needs to be educated.

Islam is not a race. It has never been a race. Islam has followers from all over the world. In fact, Arabs make up only a small portion of the so called “Religion of Peace.” Islam is a political ideology under the guise of a faith. Opposing Muslim immigration until Islamic terrorism is squashed is the wise thing to do. Anything else is simply inviting disaster into our country.

Illegal immigrants are simply that – illegal. Too many times have I heard politicians from both sides of the isle (well, there is only one side now) stating that those who follow the law should be allowed to remain. If they were following the law, they wouldn't be here in the first place! The illegals do not come to America to assimilate. How many times have you been to the grocery store and heard Spanish being spoken everywhere – especially on the first of every month? They do not want to assimilate their culture with America's. They are here simply for the money they have no hopes of getting in their home nation – where ever that may be. As well, since they are illegal, we have no way of knowing their intentions. There is no doubt in a rational person's mind that there are those among them who are here for the dastardly purposes of killing America's citizens and spreading terror. Since our borders are as porous as a sieve, it is impossible to know who is who, and what their intentions are. Securing our borders and deporting everyone who is in this country illegally is the correct thing to do. If they want to  become American citizens, there are ways to do it. Millions have done it before.

Yet it is greed, more than a lack of common sense, that fuels the 'elite's” attack on those of us who want our nation back. Illegal immigrants provide extremely cheap labor. Muslims represent the gulf states who provide most of the world's oil. America has large reserves of oil, and not only in shale. We should be processing our own instead of funding states that support terrorism. But no, our elites prefer to hob knob with the trash of the world.

Americans are angry. The Silent Majority is silent no more, and the so called “elite” don't know how to handle it other than to group us together as “crazies,” and “violent racists.” Little do they know what the future has in store for them, as the political revolution will not end with Trump. This is only the beginning.

Facebook's War For Islam and Against Conservatives

A February 18, 2016 report from Reuters has revealed that Facebook is now actively closing all accounts in Europe that criticize the influx of Muslim “immigrants.” From the report:

Facebook Inc (FB.O) began a Europe-wide campaign on Monday to thwart extremist posts on social media, after German politicians raised concerns about a rise in xenophobic comments linked to an influx of refugees.

The U.S.-based group launched its "Initiative for Civil Courage Online" in Berlin, pledging over 1 million euros (1 million pounds) to support non-governmental organizations in their efforts to counter racist and xenophobic posts.

Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg said hate speech "has no place in our society", including in the Internet.

Facebook's ground rules forbid bullying, harassment and threatening language, but critics say it does not enforce them properly.

On Friday, the firm said it had hired a unit of the publisher Bertelsmann to monitor and delete racists posts on its platform in German.

In November, prosecutes in Hamburg launched an investigation into Facebook on suspicion of not doing enough to prevent the dissemination of hate speech.

Top German politicians and celebrities have voiced concern about the rise of anti-foreigner comments on Facebook and other social media as the country struggles to cope with a tide of new migrants that amounted to 1.1 million last year alone.

Chancellor Angela Merkel has urged Facebook to do more, and the Justice ministry set up a tast force with Facebook and other social networks and Internet service providers with the aim of identifying criminal posts more quickly and taking them down.

However, this report is incomplete as Facebook has been doing this with American accounts as well. A user by the name of Jon Deaux has had his access to his personal Facebook account shut down due to his many posts concerning Islam and racism in America. Having had numerous temporary bans, the final straw for Facebook seems to have been a picture post concerning a black woman's tweet about spitting in white people's food at the fast food restaurant she worked at. The site administrators seem to believe that someone pointing out a hateful and disgusting act made by a black person or some other minority is “hate” itself. How dare anyone show a minority in a bad light, even if it's the truth?!

I myself have faced temporary bans for daring to speak out against Islam. A recent news article concerning a Muslim in Great Britain who got away scott free from rape charges hit the scene. I commented on how its now a fact, that “Muslims are raping Britain and getting away with it.” For Facebook administrators, that was considered hate speech and warranted a temporary ban.

Facebook's Community Standards states:

Facebook removes hate speech, which includes content that directly attacks people based on their:

Race,
Ethnicity,
National origin,
Religious affiliation,
Sexual orientation,
Sex, gender, or gender identity, or
Serious disabilities or diseases.

However, they do not enforce all equally. Indeed, there was a recent test performed by the NGO Shurat Hadin - Israel Law Center where they set up two pages – “Stop Israel” and “Stop Palestinians.” On each page was posted a nearly identical hate comment. Then both pages were reported to Facebook. The results?

The page inciting against Palestinians was closed by Facebook (on the same day that it was reported) for “containing credible threat of violence” which “violated our [Facebook’s] community standards,” said Shurat Hadin. The page inciting against Israelis, however, was not shut down, despite its identical hateful content. Shurat Hadin said that Facebook claimed that this page was “not in violation of Facebook’s rules.”

It is not an exaggeration to state that Facebook administrators selectively decide which is “hate” and what isn't based only upon their warped world views. Facebook users have experienced hate against them for their politically and socially Conservative beliefs in addition pro life views among many others. Yet Facebook refuses to do anything about that. 

It has become clear that Facebook is run by people whose ideology resides on the Far Left. They are now actively enforcing a pro-Muslim sentiment, and anyone who speaks out against Muslims or Islam will quickly be disciplined. Facebook users should be warned that they could risk temporary or permanent bans for standing up for their beliefs. In addition, anything they post from comments to status updates are dully recorded by Facebook. Even if they delete content from public view or their page, they remain in Facebook's database.

Facebook's actions reek of a  Far Leftist ideology which seeks to limit any speech that is in opposition to their beliefs. This is why the Democrats are trying to neuter Bloggers and news aggregators such as The Drudge Report. This is why they are attempting to force Conservative radio broadcasters to include “equal opposing views.” It all goes back to the guidelines laid out by Saul Alinsky.

We are in the fight of our lives, and the Far Left is doing everything it can to squelch “rebellion.”

A retraction - sort of

Recently, I posted a commentary concerning a group of men who raped a woman after chasing away her father with a gun. However, new evidence is coming to light. Apparently, the 18 year old woman was drunk, and her pants were already off. They claim that she was having sex with her father. According to them, they asked her if they could "have some," and she agreed. Normally, I would take this as a bunch of lies from thugs who are attempting to protect themselves from the consequences of their actions. However, there is video evidence that backs up at least some of their claims. Do I believe everything they have said? No. But I don't think it's beyond the possibility of it being true.

That being what it may, my comments regarding the awful gun laws in New York, and how it prevents people from defending themselves still stand. When this news broke, to me it epitomized the problem Americans face in a once free society when the government insists you must remain unarmed, and to defend upon only them for your security. The conviction stands, even if the story has changed.